Abstract

The education sector in India has witnessed a paradigm shift in recent years . This research focuses on studying various barriers to the implementation of technology based constructivist learning and various barriers for its successful implementation in developing countries like India . Further , the interrelationship amongst them have been discussed with the help of Interpretive Structural Modelling Methodology .

References

• Davis, F.D. 1989. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology , MIS Quarterly, 13 (3),  319-340 .
• Davis, F. R.,  Bagozzi, R. and Warshaw, P. 1989. User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models , Management Science, 35 (8),  982-1003 .
• Venkatesh ,V. 2000. Determinants of perceived ease of use: integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model , Information Systems Research, 11 (4) ,  342-365.
• V. Venkatesh, V. and  Bala , H. 2008. Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions , Decision Sciences, 39 (2) ,  273-315
• Kundu, A. and Kedar Nath , D. 2018. Barriers to Utilizing ICT in Education in India with a Special Focus on Rural Areas, International Journal of Scientific Research and Reviews (IJSRR), 7(2), 341 -359 .
• Fusilier, M. and Durlabhji , S. 2005. An exploration of student internet use in India the technology acceptance model and the theory of planned behaviour , Campus-Wide Information Systems, 22 (4),  233-246.
• The Economist. 2008. The future of higher education: How technology will shape learners. Economist Intelligence Unit, New Media Consortium
• Su, B. 2009. Effective technology integration: Old topic, new thoughts. Monterey Bay, USA.
• Aiman-Smith,L. and  Green, S.G. 2002. Implementing new manufacturing technology: the related effects of technology characteristics and user learning activities , Academy of Management Journal, 45 (2),. 421-430
• Bingimlas, K. 2009. The barriers to the successful integration of ICT in teaching and learning environments: A review of the literature. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, science and technology education, 5 (3).
• Koller, V., Harvey, S. & Magnotta, M. 2001. Technology-based teaching strategies. Social Policy Public Research Association. New York.
• Brown, I.T.J. 2002. Individual & technological factors affecting perceived ease of use of web-based learning technologies in a developing country , The Electronic Journal on Information Systems in Developing Countries, 9 (5), 1-15 .
• Tarafdar, M. and  Vaidya, S. 2006. Challenges in the adoption of E-Commerce technologies in India: the role of organizational factors, International Journal of Information Management, 26 , 428-441.
• Georgina, D. A., & Hosford, C. C. 2009. Higher education faculty perceptions on technology integration and training. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(5), 690–696. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2008.11.004
• Chan Lin, L.J., Hong, J.C., Horng, J.S., Chang, S.H., & Chu, H.C. 2006. Factors influencing technology integration in teaching: A Taiwanese perspective. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 43(1), 57–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14703290500467467
• Salehi, H., & Salehi, Z. 2012. Challenges for Using ICT in Education: Teachers’ Insights. International Journal of e-Education, e-Business, e-Management and e-Learning, 2(1), 40-43.
• Wood, E., Mueller, J., Willoughby, T., Specht, J., & Deyoung, T. 2005. Teachers’ perceptions: barriers and supports to using technology in the classroom. Education,Communication and Information, 5(2), 183–206. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14636310500186214
• Jones, A. 2004. British Educational Communications and Technology Agency (BECTA), corp creator. A review of the research literature on barriers to the uptake of ICT by teachers.
• Al-Senaidi, S., Lin, L., & Poirot, J. 2009. Barriers to adopting technology for teaching and learning in Oman. Computers & Education, 53(3), 575–590. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.03.015
• Karasavvidis, I. 2009. Activity theory as a conceptual framework for understanding teacher approaches to information and communication technologies. Computers & Education, 53(2), 436–444. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2009.03.003
• Prestridge, S. 2012. The beliefs behind the teacher that influences their ICT practices. Computers & Education, 58(1), 449–458. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.08.028
• Lee, S.M., Kim, L.S. Rhee, S.. 2006. The role of exogenous factors in technology acceptance: the case of object-oriented technology , Information and Management, 43,  469-480 .
• Catherall , P. 2005. Skills exchange experience by students in the use of education technology/e-learning. Power point presentation.
• Warfield, J.N. 1974. Developing interconnection matrices in structural modeling. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, (1), 81-87.
• Katsifili. 2010 . The impact of blackboard software on education, globally over the past 10 years. Academic Innovation, Blackboard Inc.
• Deshmukh, S.V. and Chavan, A. 2012. Six Sigma and SMEs: a critical review of literature, International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 3(2), 157-167,  https://doi.org/10.1108/20401461211243720.
• Raghunath, A. and Jayathirtha, R.V. 2013. Barriers for implementation of Six Sigma by Small and Medium Enterprises , International Journal of Advancements in Research & Technology, 2(2).